All is fair in love and war, except camping.
Anyone who takes a passing interest in the gaming industry and plays on the PC hates EA. Fact. Be it as extreme as wishing them dead or just a mild discontent with their seemingly pointless evil, like me, we hate them. Battlefield 3 changes that. Even I want to club EA's CEO to death now. Why Origin? It is just so bad compared to Steam which at least is a good service and has good design. A website as a game menu? What the shitting dick nipples is this!?! No manual in the game's box? That's crossing the line. OK, maybe the last two are on DICE but that's not the point. The point is EA is a big poo face.
More like PeeA ammarite? |
"She watched a You Tube video without having to wait ten minutes for it load. |
Lets start with the bad. The guns are a bit off. They sound the part for sure, its the recoil. They feel underpowered. But DICE have never done good guns. Getting suppressed is a bit too easy. Being suppressed is when bullets pass near you and the screen blurs up. It happens far to easy and takes too long to leave. The maps are big and firefights take place at long range meaning your never sure what your shooting at since you can only see muzzle flashes. This is very noob unfriendly. In my first game I didn't get a single kill since I had to clue what was going on. Jets constantly shake and don't seem to slow down when you brake. Since you have to unlock missiles and strafing runs are made dam near impossible due to the shake and speed your stuck chasing after other jets. I'll doubt they'll see much use outside the dedicated flyboys until a few changes are made.
An accurate representation of my flying but screaming, upside down and on fire. |
USA! USA!...Is it safe to come out now? |
Battlefield 3 is a corker of a game on its multiplayer alone. An Xp system keeps a nice trickle of new toys coming in and players are rewarded for non-combat roles like reviving, spotting and dishing out ammo. I've yet to try co-op but it offers more equipment for multiplayer and the singleplayer campaign is actually rather solid. The banter of squadmates is far between but enjoyable. It does have a few issues with the most annoying being you have to stand behind your squadmates to make them move forward. The immersion makes it far better than it is really.
So the grand question is, is it better than Modern Warfare 3? Honestly that is a stupid question and you should feel bad for asking and not because it isn't even out yet. They are two completely different experiences. MW3 is fast paced gunplay on tight maps while BF3 slows things down a notch with bigger maps and adds vehicles and destructible terrain. Its like asking if you want toast or cereal for breakfast, it depends on your mood.
Battlefield 3 is unique. There is no other game like it on the market except DICE's last game Bad Company 2. I highly recommend it despite bloody Origin.
95%
DICE is back and
kicking all the asses.
No comments:
Post a Comment